I’m dead set against #SOPA and #PIPA. I’m also against piracy and companies that make billions from being venues for copyright violators.
I’m rethinking the opposition to SOPA and PIPA by companies that are profiting massively through unlicensed sharing of other’s copyrighted materials by their users. It’s not that I agree with SOPA and PIPA but that there’s a different motive from companies like Google/YouTube and other user-submitted content sharing sites.
These billion dollar companies are based on the sharing of others’ content. Google News is an example: full text of news articles has been a point of serious contention between rights holders and Google. Google uses its near monopoly position to exact favorable exceptions from content producers. YouTube has some measure of copyright protection but you’ve likely seen the YouTube videos that excuse artifacts in their videos saying it’s to circumvent the automated content scrubbers from detecting contraband content. Image hosting sites are in the same camp: profiting from possibly illicitly posted content.
I appreciate the intent lawmakers have in protecting the rights of content creators. These content creators and copyright holders are not only Disney, MPAA, RIAA, etc. Content creators include the little guys without powerful lawyers, too. Like me. I write programs. Maybe you do, too. These are copyrighted materials that are protected by law. Even if you release your code under the GPL copyright law is there to enforce your choice of license; copyright is what makes the GPL’s “copyleft” work. Without it there would be no teeth to it’s demands.
What I do not agree with is Congress’ approach via SOPA and PIPA. I believe it completely wrong-headed and ineffective. It punishes the wrong people, and threatens the underlying technology and ecosystem of the Internet. SOPA and PIPA must be defeated.
At the same time content re-distributors that rely on users to submit content need to be held to task for profiting from the rightful content of others. Copyright must be protected or inovation will be hampered or significantly curtailed. We cannot allow a de facto abandonment of copyright or we face a bleak future with regard to inovation. Not by Disney but by the little guys today and our progeny tomorrow.
We need two things: (1) an alternative to SOPA/PIPA that curtails or makes unpleasant piracy without destroying the fabric of the Internet or punishing the innocent, and (2) a change in culture from “[Your] information wants to be free [for me]” that is currently quite popular.
Too many think they have a right to content produced by others. Think about that. Movies, songs, books, programs, etc., require production, time, effort and sacrifice. To decide “X-Men wants to be free for me!” is ridiculous at best.
So, this is the full chalenge before us:
1. Protect the Internet (stop SOPA / PIPA)
2. Protect content creators / rights holders
We’re making strides with (1) but I’m afraid certain interests are pushing aside (2) in the process to make it easier for them to profit from other’s work. How shall we procede?






